Christianity can never said to have been eliminated from Britain
during the extended time of troubles between the final failure of Rome
to guarantee Britain's safety in 446 and the decision of Pope Gregory to
send an official Papal mission to the then-most significant Anglo-Saxon
Kingdom, Kent, in 596. During that 150 years, Christianity survived and
even extended its range to the 'Gaels' beyond the Cymry. It undoubtedly
lingered as the religion of the oppressed under Anglo-Saxon rule but
without any significant help or leadership from Rome.
There
were now several political considerations from the Roman Church's
perspective and that of the Anglo-Saxon Kings, no doubt calculated with
all the consummate cynicism of such pragmatic realists. First,
the continuation of a religion of resistance amongst the Cymri without
Papal authority threatened to turn into something that might became
heretical, uncontrollable and an alternative focus of loyalty for the
unhappy Christians in the North West of Europe. Second, the
Papacy had done a great deal to re-establish itself as the cement for
Kingship with those barbarians with pretensions to be heirs to Rome
generally or locally on the Continent. Its support would be very
valuable to rising warlords who wanted both to be respected overseas and
command authority over their own chaotic and proud elites and peoples. Third,
and connected to the first, stable rule required that the masses who
had been conquered accept the new situation and their new masters and
lose hope of a return to a former situation. The Church could certainly
help with pacifying those Catholic Cymri practising the religion of the
oppressed under the yoke of pagan warlordism. Fourth, pagan
settlers were a lot less easier to handle with their allegiance to gods
of place and struggle than Christians who were taught to seek their
salvation in the world beyond through an ethos of passivity and
compliance. All that was required was for warlords to aspire to become
kings of small settled statelets and the Church would find a ready
audience for their 'moral' message. Basically, the Cymri were about to
be suckered - and so were the bulk of ordinary Saxon settlers - in a
classic deal (we cannot say 'of the devil') between two powerful forces
working towards order
But we should not forget those
beyond the defeated Cymri. The Church was making separate inroads (with
all the prestige of a passing civilisation) amongst those Celtic
'barbarians' who had never been truly conquered by Rome and who were
seeking to up their own game as plunderers, the Irish and Scots. A
significant figure in this respect is Columba who, based in Ireland,
which had received a significant Roman missionary presence in the 430s
under Palladius and Patrick, had moved, in 563, to Iona in Scotland to
found an important monastery in the Scots Kingdom of Dal Riata. By 574,
he is anointing Aedan mac Gebrain as King, showing the important
political function of senior religious figures. It is hard not to see
the history of Christianity in the British Isles, as it is elsewhere, as
primarily the psychological business of creating cultural power for
military and economic figures in return for shared control over the
population and a slice of the action.
Dal Riata was
important as an 'overlord' of the Western Isles, reaching across to the
Irish mainland. Columba became Aedan's adviser. In 375, there is a
Council Meeting at Druim Ceat in what is now County Londonderry obscure
in intent but which seems to have involved a negotiation which weakened
the hold of Dal Riata's Irish overlords without recourse to further war.
The Church's backing seems to have given a sub-King significant
advantage in those negotiations and it entered into its new historical
role as consigliere to the bosses amongst the barbarians. Columba died
in 597 just as Augustine was settling into Canterbury and within days
pilgrims are arriving at Iona, indicating another facet of Catholicism,
the popular devotion of items connected to its saints (an early example
of the cult of relics and what is now the sale room prices that might be
given for Elvis' toothbrush). This popular appeal will constrain Kings
as the only power that the masses have left in an age of iron and
slavery. It is probably true that the Church dies in proportion to Kings
being no longer necessary or powerful.
Towards the end
of the sixth century, Christianity has thus already established a
magical and cultural role amongst the Irish and Scots (perhaps merely
supplanting functionally that of the druidic priests) that the Pope now
wants to have accepted by the much more challenging Germanic barbarians.
The Church has made enormous headway amongst those barbarians who had
been awed by the monuments and culture of Rome on the Continent. It was
logical that Gregory should seek to extend that process by sending
Augustine to the capital of Kent in 596, probably still the most
culturally Roman-friendly of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms and no longer a
frontier state. Augustine arrives the next year to persuade Aethelbert
of Kent to embrace Catholicism which means if he does so, so does much
of Southern England. Augustine becomes the first Archbishop of
Canterbury in 597 (although he had probably already been ordained Bishop
by the Frankish Church). Catholicism thus returns to Britain. The
mission is a success. The Pope sends more resources in 601 in the form
of assistants, bringing vital ritual tools (the whole business being not
just one of claiming magic but of showing magic to be done). There is
then a surge of pastoral activity - he revives the Bishopric of York
(there is a strong institutional memory of the old provincial
administrative structures within the Roman Church) and appoints Paulinus
to it and consecrates two more assistants, Mellitus and Justus, as
bishops for the East Saxons in 604. Mellitus gets Bishop of London and
Justus Bishop of Rochester so we can see the mission steadily moving
into enemy pagan territory.
This is not without its
risks. The pagan Aethelfrith of Northumbria in that same year (604) had
allegedly slaughtered 200 priests who, like their druidic forebears, had
turned up at the battle of Chester to pray for the Cymric forces. We
can see the challenge - on one side of the Island, the Church is
promising the same sort of support for power granted to Aedan mac
Gebrain only a few years before in Scotland to the sort of people who
probably believed that Christians were employing their magical,
political and religious powers against them on the other side of the
island. The question was going to be whether the Church in Rome could
guarantee the neutralisation of the magical power employed against the
Saxons (not that it appeared to do the Cymry any good) by making it
equally available to them and whether that magical power was more
politically useful and efficacious than traditional pagan ways. Whether
Scrocmail the priest who was one of the fifty who escaped the massacre
at Chester would have appreciated Augustine's dealing with the enemy is
not recorded by history.
Aethelbert of Kent is
converted to catholicism. His son reverts to paganism on acquiring the
throne (as we noted in the last posting) but reverts back quite quickly
suggesting that there are powerful political motives for abandoning
paganism in Kent by this date (616). Augustine's successor, Archbishop
Laurentius, who oversees this hiccup, dies in 619. He is succeeded by
Mellitus but London reverts to paganism on his departure which suggests
that something is enforcing the religion and that its power waxes and
wanes with the degree to which religious observance can be 'insisted
upon'. History of course is with Christian power. The succession of
Archbishops continues with Honorius (note the Latin name) in 624. As
with the kings, we will not bother ourselves with episcopal successions,
only being interested in those clerical figures who mark major shifts
and changes in culture and power. By the end of our period, it is clear
that, although Christianity may have only a formal foothold in just one
Anglo-Saxon Kingdom and is the ramshackle religion of the defeated
everywhere else and those who always were outside the Roman pale, it is
to be taken seriously once again in British politics after 150 years in
the wilderness.
This does not purport to be anything better or worse than Churchill's efforts. It is not the work of a professional historian. Criticisms in comments are welcome (and texts may be changed accordingly). It is an attempt to update the standard narrative and is a guide for further research.
Showing posts with label Aethelfrith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aethelfrith. Show all posts
Sunday, 2 August 2015
560-624: The Return of Christian Influence
Labels:
Aethelfrith,
Augustine,
Canterbury,
Catholic Church,
Christianity,
Columba,
Cymry,
Dal Riata,
Gaels,
Irish,
Kent,
London,
Mellitus,
Paulinus,
Pope Gregory,
Scots
560-624: The Kingdoms Establish Themselves
A king's leadership is not, however, always uncontested. Ceawlin
himself seems to have been ousted, probably by Ceol, but he may just as
likely have been killed at another significant battle, also obscure,
with Aethelbert of Kent reversing the position of 568 in 591and
replacing Ceawlin as capo di tutti capi or rather 'bretwalda' or overlord of the Anglo-Saxons, at least in Southern England.
The violence continues into the seventh century as you would expect (the arrival and early history of Christianity is covered in the next posting). Two kingdoms, Bernicia, which we have mentioned, and Deira merge to become a major force in the North of England called Northumbria under Aethelfrith who becomes a dominant figure in wars against the Cymry, with a great deciding battle at Chester in 607. He dies in 617 at the hands of Raedwald, King of East Anglia, another Anglo-Saxon Kingdom we have taken somewhat for granted in this series. We have also taken for granted Mercia in the Midlands through which Raedwald marched with impunity to 'take out' Athelfrith. Mercia will later become very important. Who is and who is not an overlord of the English is sometimes never very clear - Aethelfrith appears to have been one so Raedwald defeating and killing him in battle naturally made him his successor. Or did it? Although defeated by Raedwald, Aethelfrith is succeeded by a strong figure in Edwin under whom Northumbrian power continues to increase culturally and politically and he is widely seen as the natural 'bretwalda'.
What is actually going on is a story of personal and dynastic rivalries, greed and lust for power, of which Game of Thrones is merely the fictional version. Most of the detail is of no interest to us. What we are interested in are the grand themes and it is to be noted here that by the time we get to struggles between Athelfrith and Raedwald in the 610s, positions on Christianity and paganism have become part of the mix. For example, it is a material political fact that the son of Aethelberht of Kent, Eadbald, reverts to paganism for a brief period in 616 but is soon 'persuaded' back into the fold because it is becoming clear that Christian clerical support is an asset and loss of that support is a problem. The re-emergence of Christianity is what we have to turn to next.
The period closes with a number of kingdoms vying for leadership of Anglo-Saxon England. Traditionally these will come to be termed a heptarchy of four major players (Wessex, Mercia, East Anglia and Northumbria) and three small 'original' settler Kingdoms (Kent, Sussex and Wessex) but this belies the complexity of the situation with borders shifting, mergers (as with Bernicia and Deira into Northumbria), shifting power bases (with the South Eastern Kingdoms becoming less important over time in favour of the geographically bigger 'frontier' states) and some small settlement kingdoms simply becoming subsumed into others, such as Middlesex as contested territory. There are also viable small Cymric states surviving in the South West, Wales proper and Cumbria and, of course, there are Pictish and Scottish proto-states to the North.
The violence continues into the seventh century as you would expect (the arrival and early history of Christianity is covered in the next posting). Two kingdoms, Bernicia, which we have mentioned, and Deira merge to become a major force in the North of England called Northumbria under Aethelfrith who becomes a dominant figure in wars against the Cymry, with a great deciding battle at Chester in 607. He dies in 617 at the hands of Raedwald, King of East Anglia, another Anglo-Saxon Kingdom we have taken somewhat for granted in this series. We have also taken for granted Mercia in the Midlands through which Raedwald marched with impunity to 'take out' Athelfrith. Mercia will later become very important. Who is and who is not an overlord of the English is sometimes never very clear - Aethelfrith appears to have been one so Raedwald defeating and killing him in battle naturally made him his successor. Or did it? Although defeated by Raedwald, Aethelfrith is succeeded by a strong figure in Edwin under whom Northumbrian power continues to increase culturally and politically and he is widely seen as the natural 'bretwalda'.
What is actually going on is a story of personal and dynastic rivalries, greed and lust for power, of which Game of Thrones is merely the fictional version. Most of the detail is of no interest to us. What we are interested in are the grand themes and it is to be noted here that by the time we get to struggles between Athelfrith and Raedwald in the 610s, positions on Christianity and paganism have become part of the mix. For example, it is a material political fact that the son of Aethelberht of Kent, Eadbald, reverts to paganism for a brief period in 616 but is soon 'persuaded' back into the fold because it is becoming clear that Christian clerical support is an asset and loss of that support is a problem. The re-emergence of Christianity is what we have to turn to next.
The period closes with a number of kingdoms vying for leadership of Anglo-Saxon England. Traditionally these will come to be termed a heptarchy of four major players (Wessex, Mercia, East Anglia and Northumbria) and three small 'original' settler Kingdoms (Kent, Sussex and Wessex) but this belies the complexity of the situation with borders shifting, mergers (as with Bernicia and Deira into Northumbria), shifting power bases (with the South Eastern Kingdoms becoming less important over time in favour of the geographically bigger 'frontier' states) and some small settlement kingdoms simply becoming subsumed into others, such as Middlesex as contested territory. There are also viable small Cymric states surviving in the South West, Wales proper and Cumbria and, of course, there are Pictish and Scottish proto-states to the North.
Labels:
Aethelbert,
Aethelfrith,
Anglo-Saxon,
Bretwalda,
Ceawlin,
Christianity,
Cymru,
East Anglia,
Heptarchy,
Kent,
Mercia,
Northumbria,
Raedwald,
Wessex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)